[EM] Net Wins Tiebreaker, Supp. 11
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Tue Jun 22 22:14:55 PDT 1999
I return to the 3 clone circular tie example in Supp. 5 but adding the raw
votes--
X Y1 Y2 Y3 Z HTot Net
X -- 40 40 40 65 185 -30
Y1 60 -- 100 100 25 285 170
Y2 60 0 -- 100 25 185 -30
Y3 60 0 0 -- 25 85 -230
Z 35 75 75 75 -- 260 120
VTot 215 115 215 315 140 1000 0
Note; 1000 wins/losses = 100 voters x (4+3+2+1)
The highest raw number in a column indicates the most cloning. i,e. Y3
Eliminating Y3 produces
X Y1 Y2 Z HTot Net
X -- 40 40 65 145 -10
Y1 60 -- 100 25 185 70
Y2 60 0 -- 25 85 -130
Z 35 75 75 -- 185 70
VTot 155 115 215 115 600 0
Note: 600 wins/losses = 100 voters x (3+2+1)
Eliminating Y2 produces
X Y1 Z HTot Net
X -- 40 65 105 10
Y1 60 -- 25 85 -30
Z 35 75 -- 110 20
VTot 95 115 90 300 0
Note: 300 wins/losses = 100 voters x (2+1)
Eliminating Y1 produces
X Z HTot Net
X -- 65 65 30
Z 35 -- 35 -30
VTot 35 65 100 0
X wins.
I am not sure if Condorcet meant the above elimination procedure in case of
circular ties (due to his somewhat cryptic language). If yes, then it can be
called the Max Losses (or ??? Condorcet) tiebreaker.
Using the raw numbers in a matrix should be a little simpler for test
purposes using a larger matrix and a computer program.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list