[EM] A new Smith-efficient, monotone and cloneproof method (significantly different than Schulze/Ranked Pairs)

Kristofer Munsterhjelm km-elmet at munsterhjelm.no
Sun Mar 23 07:46:53 PDT 2025

Previous message (by thread): [EM] A new Smith-efficient, monotone and cloneproof method (significantly different than Schulze/Ranked Pairs)
Next message (by thread): [EM] Please test Evaluative-proportional representation (EPR) that is now available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2025-03-19 23:35, Ted Stern wrote:
> In addition, I believe the method fails Burial, Chicken Dilemma 
> (defection), and forced cycle.

What do you mean by failing Burial and forced cycle?

-km

Previous message (by thread): [EM] A new Smith-efficient, monotone and cloneproof method (significantly different than Schulze/Ranked Pairs)
Next message (by thread): [EM] Please test Evaluative-proportional representation (EPR) that is now available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list