[EM] Condorcet mention in a relatively mainstream context

[Michael Garman]

I don’t care if the list sees what I say to you. I certainly don’t make it
a secret on my public messages. I just think the rest of the list might not
be terribly concerned with seeing us trading barbs.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 8:59 PM robert bristow-johnson via Election-Methods
<election-methods at lists.electorama.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 06/26/2025 8:54 PM EDT Michael Garman <michael.garman at rankthevote.us>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > And who are these impartial jurists of whom you speak?
> >
> >
>
> Not all jurists are impartial.  I didn't use that word (not yet, anyway).
>
> The answer to that question depends entirely on the context.
>
> Perhaps, in the issue that you and I dispute, they are the others in this
> mailing list.  That is why I responded publicly to your privately-emailed
> snark (which is okay, you can snark at me in private, but don't count on me
> not tattling).
>
>
> --
>
> r b-j . _ . _ . _ . _ rbj at audioimagination.com
>
> "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
>
> .
> .
> .
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20250626/b9c477e9/attachment.htm>