[EM] Condorcet mention in a relatively mainstream context

[Michael Garman]

And who are these impartial jurists of whom you speak?

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 8:53 PM robert bristow-johnson via Election-Methods
<election-methods at lists.electorama.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 06/26/2025 8:46 PM EDT Michael Garman <michael.garman at rankthevote.us>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don’t disagree with you on any of that.
> >
>
> Oh, yes you do.
>
> > But I will say that
> >
> > > I'm pigheadedly stubborn about the truth. And I call out lies and
> liars.
> >
> > is indistinguishable from what a Trumper would say.
>
> Yes, but it's in the content of what they say.  Same awful problem with
> Young Earth Creationists, Flat Earthers, Anti-vax Conspiracists,
> Never-Flew-To-The-Moon Conspiracists, etc.
>
> Sure Trumpers can say that I'm lying when I say that Biden legitimately
> won the presidential election in 2020.  They call me "liar" and I call them
> "liar".  Litigation is full of "he said, she said" or "they say, we say"
> litigants.  They can't *all* be telling the truth.  So then the jurists
> must examine what is said, what the evidence is and the quality of the
> evidence, and the logic behind the claims and how it comports to the
> evidence.
>
> --
>
> r b-j . _ . _ . _ . _ rbj at audioimagination.com
>
> "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
>
> .
> .
> .
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20250626/dc4e735e/attachment.htm>