[EM] inaccurate Fargo approval voting results

[Closed Limelike Curves]

Yeah, the vote totals were completely correct; the issue was Fargo didn’t
report voter turnout or the number of ballots, weirdly enough.

On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 7:42 PM Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the information. Though some of us will write to them about the
> mis-reporting, I hope that you will too, or already have. They should
> definitely hear from the person who noticed it, & not just 2nd-hand.
>
> It’s a relief that the winners have been correctly reported.
>
> Again, thank you for pointing that error out.
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 05:28 Evangeline Moore <evangeline.moore at ih21.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I work at a Czech institute researching voting methods, and a while back
>> I took an interest in the approval voting elections in Fargo. While I was
>> running the numbers, trying to build a model for a separate project, I
>> noticed that the approval vote results have never been accurately reported
>> in Fargo. The winners are right, but the percentages are not. They've never
>> crossed 50% approval despite being widely reported that way.
>>
>> I posted an explanation of this on our website:
>> https://www.ih21.org/aktuality/approval-voting-in-fargo When I realized
>> that another election is coming up and that, as far as I can tell, nobody
>> else has made the methodology publicly known yet, I wanted to get this out
>> there. I also thought you guys might find it interesting.
>>
>> EM
>> ----
>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
>> info
>>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240607/724fde43/attachment.htm>