[EM] Postpone voting-deadline till after the simulation-results?

[Michael Ossipoff]

👍

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 14:15 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
wrote:

> On 2024-04-30 21:55, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> > The simulation  could provide important information about the
> > voting-systems—in matters that are currently mostly speculative…with
> > most of the methods currently little-known at best.
>
> I should get the cardinal (and cardinal hybrid) simulation results done
> in time, so that shouldn't be a problem.
>
> My simulator currently also returns how often a method fails to
> different particular strategies: burial, compromising, either (the same
> election is vulnerable to any of the two), and other strategies (for
> ranked methods, usually pushover). So reporting that should be
> relatively easy.
>
> However, implementing per-faction stats would be much more difficult. I
> don't want to put pressure on myself to get it done, but I don't want to
> hold up the poll either.
>
> So I would support the status quo. I'll write a post about the cardinal
> and hybrid methods when I've verified the results, and probably post a
> link to the per-strategy breakdown.
>
> If I get to implement additional methods or stats reporting within the
> deadline, then that's all icing. But if not, I would suggest just going
> with what we have.
>
> -km
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240430/d0e79d77/attachment.htm>