[EM] Internet polls & greater-evils

[Michael Garman]

Nice and dishonest as always, Mike! “Nearly 30%” isn’t even close to the
45% or so he’s polling at in most real polls.

I want you to be right. I really do. But you’re not, and you know you’re
making disingenuous arguments to support your claim.

On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 12:55 AM Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I’ve pointed out that you don’t need the Democrat to keep the Republican
> from winning, because the Republican always finishes at the BOTTOM in the
> output-ranking of Internet polls. …& is Condorcet loser. Every time.
>
> Some claim that’s sampling-bias. Someone here recently claimed that.
>
> But, as exemplified by the current CIVS poll “2024 presidential election”,
> that claim is contradicted by the Republican’s support.
>
> e.g. In the a abovementioned current poll, Trump is voted over the other
> candidates by nearly 30% of the voters, & is approved by nearly 30%.
>
> (That poll has “approval-line” as a candidate.)
>
> That’s close to what we hear is so in the actual voting population.
> Doesn’t sound to me like a biased sample.
>
> But the Republican, in that poll & always, finishes at bottom & is
> Condorcet loser.
>
> …& couldn’t possibly beat any progressive candidate.
>
> So vote honestly. You don’t need a lesser-evil.
>
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240428/65c5b0c2/attachment.htm>