[EM] Approval ballots in "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods"? (was: Re: Manipulability stats for (some) poll methods)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_elmet at t-online.de
Sat Apr 27 05:48:28 PDT 2024
On 2024-04-27 14:10, Chris Benham wrote:
> Kristofer,
>
> How did Approval interpret these fully ranked ballots?
That's part of why I'm just referring to JGA. To do the simulation
myself, I would have to implicitly code a guideline that says where the
cutoff should be placed, given candidate-voter distances (which stand in
for absolute utilities). (The other part is that my simulator doesn't
support forcing the strategic ballots to be approval-style either yet.)
Unfortunately, James doesn't say just how he did it, so I'm CCing this
post to him. How were the approval ballots generated in "Four
Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods"?
In the absence of any information, I'd guess he used above-mean utility
thresholding. The strategic ballots (used to try to flip the winner)
don't have to care about utility at all: that process just tries
approval ballots at random until something works.
-km
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list