[EM] Revised ballot, Wednesday, April 17th

[Michael Ossipoff]

Oops!! I’d missed that !!

Yes, because I spoke of unlisted alternatives all equal-ranked at #9, then
yes, of course I must explicitly rank Plurality last, at rank #12.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 15:03 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
wrote:

> On 2024-04-17 23:29, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> > Ranking:
> >
> > 1. Approval
> > 2. STAR
> > 3. Approval with separate runoff
> > 4. Condorcet-IRV
> > 5. RP(wv)
> > 6. MinMax(wv)
> > 7. Smith//Approval(implicit)
> > 8. Schulze
> > 9. All nominees not listed above or below
> > 10. Majority-Judgment family
> > 11. IRV
> >
> > Couldn’t rank among the 9ty-place nominees, because I don’t know their
> > properties. One shouldn’t vote on what one doesn’t know.
>
> Plurality is on the nomination list. Are you placing it ninth too? I'm
> just asking because I imagine you know its properties, so it doesn't
> seem to fit the class.
>
> -km
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240417/cb002d87/attachment.htm>