[EM] "Double Defeat, Hare" poll candidate

[Michael Garman]

Where did I say that? Not seeing any results for that word in my search
history.

Keep the personal insults coming. They’re only making you look worse and
worse.

Michael J. Garman | he/him

Digital & Campus Organizer | Rank the Vote

Book a meeting with me! <https://calendly.com/michael-j-garman>

(401) 644-4108 | michael.garman at rankthevote.us


On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:41 PM Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> No, not really. You claimed that I was “arrogant” as part of your
> statements about the poll.
>
> I wouldn’t get discouraged from the poll because a Dunning-Kruger IRVist
> doesn’t like Approval.
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:31 Michael Garman <
> michael.garman at rankthevote.us> wrote:
>
>> The last message I sent before you angrily stormed off was about the
>> merits of approval. I didn’t realize we couldn’t discuss election methods
>> on this forum :-D
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:30 PM Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:26 Michael Garman <
>>> michael.garman at rankthevote.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You asked for people to push back if we disagreed, so I did. That’s not
>>>> contrarianism for its own sake. If you can’t take the heat…
>>>>
>>>
>>> I invited people to discuss differences & call for a vote as a last
>>> resort, but your post that exhausted my patience went beyond that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michael J. Garman | he/him
>>>>
>>>> Digital & Campus Organizer | Rank the Vote
>>>>
>>>> Book a meeting with me! <https://calendly.com/michael-j-garman>
>>>>
>>>> (401) 644-4108 | michael.garman at rankthevote.us
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:25 PM Michael Ossipoff <
>>>> email9648742 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Argumentative for its own sake about the poll.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:21 Michael Garman <
>>>>> michael.garman at rankthevote.us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m also curious where I’ve been a “contrarian for its own sake.” My
>>>>>> ideas might not be common on here, but I’ve been consistent in what I
>>>>>> support and advocate for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:12 PM robert bristow-johnson <
>>>>>> rbj at audioimagination.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael Ossipoff wrote:
>>>>>>> > I was discouraged when It seemed like Garman’s & Robert’s
>>>>>>> contrarinesses-for-its own-sake was the state-of affairs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When have I ever been a "contrarian-for-its-own-sake"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am a Condorcet partisan (regarding single-winner elections).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have good reasons for being an exclusive Condorcet partisan.  I am
>>>>>>> and have been completely consistent about it.  If I am contradicting
>>>>>>> someone here, it's likely only motivated by that.
>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for
>>>>>>> list info
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for
>>>>>> list info
>>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240417/8f89ccdd/attachment-0001.htm>