[EM] "Double Defeat, Hare" poll candidate

[Michael Ossipoff]

No, not really. You claimed that I was “arrogant” as part of your
statements about the poll.

I wouldn’t get discouraged from the poll because a Dunning-Kruger IRVist
doesn’t like Approval.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:31 Michael Garman <michael.garman at rankthevote.us>
wrote:

> The last message I sent before you angrily stormed off was about the
> merits of approval. I didn’t realize we couldn’t discuss election methods
> on this forum :-D
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:30 PM Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:26 Michael Garman <
>> michael.garman at rankthevote.us> wrote:
>>
>>> You asked for people to push back if we disagreed, so I did. That’s not
>>> contrarianism for its own sake. If you can’t take the heat…
>>>
>>
>> I invited people to discuss differences & call for a vote as a last
>> resort, but your post that exhausted my patience went beyond that.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Michael J. Garman | he/him
>>>
>>> Digital & Campus Organizer | Rank the Vote
>>>
>>> Book a meeting with me! <https://calendly.com/michael-j-garman>
>>>
>>> (401) 644-4108 | michael.garman at rankthevote.us
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:25 PM Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Argumentative for its own sake about the poll.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:21 Michael Garman <
>>>> michael.garman at rankthevote.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I’m also curious where I’ve been a “contrarian for its own sake.” My
>>>>> ideas might not be common on here, but I’ve been consistent in what I
>>>>> support and advocate for.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:12 PM robert bristow-johnson <
>>>>> rbj at audioimagination.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Ossipoff wrote:
>>>>>> > I was discouraged when It seemed like Garman’s & Robert’s
>>>>>> contrarinesses-for-its own-sake was the state-of affairs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When have I ever been a "contrarian-for-its-own-sake"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a Condorcet partisan (regarding single-winner elections).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have good reasons for being an exclusive Condorcet partisan.  I am
>>>>>> and have been completely consistent about it.  If I am contradicting
>>>>>> someone here, it's likely only motivated by that.
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for
>>>>>> list info
>>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for
>>>>> list info
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240417/73daadfb/attachment.htm>