[EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections

Michael Ossipoff email9648742 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 02:10:27 PDT 2024


Check out my initial poll-proposal. How could it be mis-construed? What
several different meanings could it have?

What remained in doubt?

What about what Mallkevich said? He didn’t really say anything specific.


On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 02:03 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
wrote:

> On 2024-04-13 07:54, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 16:05 Kristofer Munsterhjelm :
> >
> >
> >     I would prefer that the merit question for the poll stays the same:
> >     "which voting methods do you prefer to which others?", i.e. ranking
> >     them
> >     in preference.
> >
> >     Then it would be up to the individual voter to consider what aspects
> of
> >     the method are most important
> >
> >
> > :-D. “…stays the same”?  You’re trying to completely reverse the
> > express-purpose & entire fundamental nature of the poll that I proposed.
> > It was for informing voters about the EM membership’s social-ranking of
> > *proposals for public political elections*.
>
> What this shows is that the purpose of the poll wasn't made clear
> enough. See also Joseph Malkevitch' post, sfs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240413/d9626ce5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list