[EM] Express any wish for democratic choice of poll-parameters. Do-able if desired.

[Michael Ossipoff]

A better words of what I meant is:

It’s important that the count be by a method that EM members like, because
otherwise the poll would be meaningless for the purpose of expressing EM
preference among methods.

That’s why I so emphatically wanted to make it be one there people like.

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 12:05 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
wrote:

> On 2024-04-10 20:56, Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 02:54 Kristofer Munsterhjelm
> > <km_elmet at t-online.de <mailto:km_elmet at t-online.de>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>    I don't think it's
> >>    necessary to complicate matters by having a vote about what voting
> >>    method to use, or by inventing a meta-voting method.
> >
> >>    In short, let's keep it simple!
> >
> >
> > Oh we wouldn’t want to complicate it by naming a count-method for
> > counting it.
>
> Given that I said "voting", not "naming", and given that we've both
> already named some voting methods that could be used, what is your point?
>
> -km
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240410/1df2475f/attachment.htm>