[EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections

[Michael Ossipoff]

Closed, my favorite is Approval, & I prefer Score to the ranked-methods,
due to its relative simplicity & FBC compliance… especially when it’s used
right…voting max &
zero, & using partial-points only when it’s uncertain whether a candidate
deserves approval.

But, realistically, EM prefers Condorcet complying methods.

To vote on the choice of a voting method for the poll:

(#1 is of interest, but #2 is primary)

1. What are a few of your most favorite of those?

2. Rank a few of your favorites in order of preference.

…&, in case there’s a circlular-tie, designate a method whose winner you’d
approve, along with whatever you like better.

That’s the Voter’s Choice solution if there’s circular-tie, when we don’t
have an agreed-upon completion-rule.

To
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 20:40 Closed Limelike Curves <
closed.limelike.curves at gmail.com> wrote:

> Kristofer, what method should be used to poll on the preference on methods?
>>
> Here, I'd just say that the ideal is to collect cardinal ballots and
> release them completely, so we can calculate any method we want.
>
> Personally, I'd like to do a complete data analysis that probably wouldn't
> use any particular voting method.
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 7:34 AM robert bristow-johnson <
> rbj at audioimagination.com> wrote:
>
>> Kristofer, what method should be used to poll on the preference on
>> methods?
>>
>> *Powered by Cricket Wireless*
>>
>> ------ Original message------
>> *From: *Kristofer Munsterhjelm
>> *Date: *Sat, Apr 6, 2024 10:04
>> *To: *Toby Pereira;Filip Ejlak;Michael Ossipoff;
>> *Cc: *EM;
>> *Subject:*Re: [EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming
>> enactment-elections
>>
>> On 2024-04-06 09:14, Toby Pereira wrote:
>> > I notice you haven't included my nominations. I'm guessing you blocked
>> > me after you threw your toys out of the pram over your "Bias Free"
>> > method on the Voting Theory Forum. I notice Kristofer suggested some
>> > methods that aren't in the list either. I'm not sure this can really
>> > count as a poll of EM members if this person has decided to selectively
>> > ignore people.
>>
>> Maybe somebody else could run the poll? I'd nominate myself, but I've
>> got two people blocked.
>>
>> I guess I could unplonk them for the duration if no better solution
>> presents itself -- but if MO has got me blocked too, it'd be far from ideal.
>>
>> -km
>> ----
>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info
>>
>> ----
>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
>> info
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240409/6bdf24e4/attachment.htm>