[EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 2024-04-08 07:26, Closed Limelike Curves wrote:
>>     That's it.  One-person-one-vote leads to Majority rule which leads
>>     to some Condorcet-consistent method.  I believe that this principle
>>     takes primacy over any other for deciding single-winner elections
>>     when there is no proportionality to be had.  For multi-winner
>>     elections I might be for an STV method.
> 
> Then STAR should be great, since it has sky-high Condorcet efficiency. 
> It's easily more Condorcet-efficient than approval (because of the extra 
> runoff, which can elect a Condorcet winner in second place), and 
> approval already tends to pick Condorcet winners in practice.

But if you're right about the results of its clone dependence, isn't 
STAR just Range with cowbell? That is, it would reduce to Range itself 
due to the existence of rated (rated-equal) clones.

-km