[EM] What is canonical Bucklin voting?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_elmet at t-online.de
Sat Jan 29 05:35:21 PST 2022
On 29.01.2022 04:06, culitif at tuta.io wrote:
> Hi, I know what's labelled as "Bucklin" is messy and it's more a
> category of methods, but I thought I figured what would make sense as
> the most conventional choice of what a Bucklin system would refer to.
>
> But then I read about Fallback Voting and realized I just coded that.
> There's also another system I've seen referenced that uses a top-two
> system. I named this "historical Bucklin", but now I'm wondering if that
> is the most canonical Bucklin system. Am I missing something?
>
This article provides a reasonably good description of various voting
methods, as they're defined on EM:
http://www.9mail.de/m-schulze/votedesc.pdf
The section on Bucklin agrees with how I've understood it: it's a ranked
method where you stepwise add in first, second, ..., kth rank until
someone attains a majority.
Due to Bucklin's LNHelp feature combined with a lack of LNHarm leads to
a natural idea of letting voters instruct Bucklin to "skip ranks" on
their ballots. This in turn leads to majority grade methods like MJ.
(The article is wrong about supplementary voting being a form of
Bucklin, though. It is a two-step IRV.)
-km
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list