[EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 207, Issue 29, Debates about MJ

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 18.10.2021 19:52, steve bosworth wrote:
> 
> 
> TO: Forest
> 
> FROM: Steve (stevebosworth at hotmail.com)
> 
> Below, Forest offers what seems to me to be a strange and unintelligible
> suggestion which is supposed to relate to my current support of MJ. Is
> this suggestion just a playful in joke that I do not understand, or
> please explain its serious relevance to debates about the virtues of MJ?

He's basically saying "MJ is good, but it fails reversal symmetry and
participation. Can we make a method that does what MJ does, but also
passes reversal symmetry and participation?"

It's not (as I would see it, at least) a practical proposal, but he's
exploring whether it is at all possible.

-km