[EM] Most important/used election methods?

[Forest Simmons]

I'm quite sure he is referring to MinMaxPairwiseOpposition MMPO, which is
very closely related to MinMax(losing votes) but not the same.

As you know MMPO is an FBC compliant method that fails Plurality and
Condorcet.

While MinMax(lv) is a perfectly good Plurality (and Chicken Dilemma)
Criterion compliant Condorcet method.

El jue., 14 de oct. de 2021 1:45 p. m., Kristofer Munsterhjelm <
km_elmet at t-online.de> escribió:

> On 14.10.2021 19:22, Richard, the VoteFair guy wrote:
> > On 10/13/2021 11:50 AM, Bohdan Andriyiv wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Is there a list that sorts election methods by popularity or importance?
> >>
> >> If there is none, could you please make one and enlighten me and the
> >> planet Earth?
> >
> > Years ago we tried to enlighten the planet Earth by writing and signing
> > the "Declaration of Election-Method Reform Advocates", a copy of which
> > is at:
> >
> >   http://www.votefair.org/bansinglemarkballots/index.html
> >
> > We do not agree on any ranking by importance, but most of us did agree
> > that we support the use of the following four categories:
> >
> > * Approval voting
> >
> > * most of the Condorcet methods
> >
> > * Majority Judgment
> >
> > * Range voting (now better known as Score voting)
> >
> > If we were to update the list it would probably include STAR voting --
> > because it's based on Score voting, yet it's better than Score voting.
> >
> > And I believe it would include the version of Minimax that uses winning
> > votes -- even though this variation does not always elect the Condorcet
> > winner.
>
> Minmax(wv) passes the Condorcet criterion:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimax_Condorcet_method#Satisfied_and_failed_criteria
> Are you referring to another method here?
>
> -km
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20211014/c72139da/attachment.html>