[EM] robla's weekly hangout: 2pm-4pm PDT/PST on Tuesdays
roblan at gmail.com
Thu Nov 11 12:53:28 PST 2021
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 9:49 AM Daniel Carrera <dcarrera at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been a fan of Condorcet for decades but I only discovered Yee diagrams
> recently. I was shocked at how bad IRV is. It's shocking that a candidate can be
> right at the center of the voter distribution and somehow lose.
I was like you when I learned about Yee diagrams. Apparently, even
Yee was surprised at how badly Hare's method performed in the
I suspect that those of us who have convinced ourselves that we're
"good at math" AND had also mentally worked out many of the problems
with Hare/IRV have no problem understanding something as clearly and
concisely explained as Yee's work is. But I also think that Yee's work
is an example of people who are "good at math" talking to each other.
Someone who is from a disadvantaged population who is eager to see
proportional mult-winner methods enter the American mainstream might
feel threatened by such sharp (and jagged) criticism of Hare. It
seems we need to figure out how to communicate Yee's work to a broad
and diverse audience who may be skeptical of the nerd talk.
I deeply appreciate Nicky Case's work:
I suspect there are many people who discovered Yee's work via Case's
work. It's incredibly impressive, and helps those with learning
styles that require interactivity. But I don't think this is enough.
How do we get more people to have the "aha" moment that many of us
here on this mailing list have had?
More information about the Election-Methods