[EM] Manipulation Resistant Voting

Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_elmet at t-online.de
Sat Jul 17 10:17:17 PDT 2021

On 17.07.2021 04:58, Susan Simmons wrote:
> It is well known that there is no incentive for dishonest voting when
> the method is to elect the candidate indicated on a randomly chosen
> secret ballot.
> Is there also a manipulation free deterministic method?

Doesn't Gibbard's theorem answer that in the negative?


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list