[EM] A stronger proportionality criterion than Droop and a weaker no harm criterion than LNH

[rahyman at sbcglobal.net]

Oops.  The second variant does not require truncated ballots but I forgot to
remove that from the definitions of V_A and S_A for the second variant.
They should read

V_A equals the sum of ballots with candidate A the highest ranked hopeful
candidate.

S_A equals the sum of seat values of all  ballots with candidate A the
highest ranked hopeful candidate.

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20181006/aed3bdf3/attachment.html>