[EM] Searching for references

[Stéphane Rouillon]

Thanks a lot for all the pointers...

Envoyé de mon iPhone

> Le 22 févr. 2018 à 17:05, Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de> a écrit :
> 
>> On 02/22/2018 09:00 PM, Stéphane Rouillon wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I do not know if Forest Simmons or Rob Lanphier are still active on this list, however it should be the best place to find some help.
>> I am searching for specific references:
>> 1) a site with 5 single-winner methods that lead to 5 different winners (from a personal website of a university teacher, Syracuse maybe),
> 
> RangeVoting's 6-methods-6-answers page http://rangevoting.org/PuzzKjqAns2.html references one Joe Malkevitch. Some more searching leads to http://www.jdawiseman.com/papers/electsys/conundrum.html and then to https://www.york.cuny.edu/~malk/tidbits/tidbit-elections.html (note, unusual notation).
> 
>> 2) typical references for approval, Concorcet, range and median single-winner methods.
> 
> Here are some, not exhaustive a list:
> 
> Median: Majority judgement: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhhg1
> 
> Approval voting: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/approval-voting/7CE5DEEE235794B0B12F76ADAE621482
> 
> Condorcet: the Schulze method: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4 or http://m-schulze.9mail.de/schulze1.pdf
> 
> Condorcet: Ranked Pairs (margins), also defines independence from clones: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00433944
> 
> Condorcet: Maximize Affirmed Majorities (Ranked Pairs/wv): http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~seppley/
> 
> Condorcet: Kemeny: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20026529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
> 
> Condorcet: Kemeny is NP-hard: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397505005785
> 
> Condorcet: Strategy resistant Condorcet-IRV hybrids: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12954393981869601543
> 
> An Introduction to Vote-Counting Schemes: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.9.1.3
>    gives short descriptions of Plurality, SNTV, Approval, top-two runoff, STV, Coombs, Borda (based on the pairwise matrix), Copeland, a method called Minimum Violations, Ranked Pairs, Minmax, Kemeny, Keener/Kendall-Wei (eigenvalue/pagerank), and a method called the Jech method.
> 
>> 3) typical literature reference for the latest attempts to generalize each of these to multi-winner proportional methods.
> 
> And some of these:
> 
> The Quota Borda system: https://philpapers.org/rec/DUMVP-2
> 
> Lots of STV variants, ends by explaining CPO-STV: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.9.1.27
> 
> CPO-STV in greater detail: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1005082925477
> 
> Phragmén and Thiele methods (multiwinner approval and a ranked version used in Sweden): https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08826
> 
> More on Phragmén and Thiele: https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI17/paper/view/14757
>    Includes references to 1890s papers by the two.
> 
> Minimax approval (consensus multiwinner method): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-007-9165-x or https://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/11/90/26/PDF/AN6LAMSADE_77-104.pdf
> 
> Schulze STV: http://m-schulze.9mail.de/schulze2.pdf see citations for Schulze's out of journal work at https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=wGVUJ7sAAAAJ
> 
> Schulze's STV-MMP proposal: http://m-schulze.9mail.de/schulze4.pdf (see above for cites)
> 
> I'm not aware of any published papers generalizing MJ/Bucklin to multiwinner, or any mentioning proportional/reweighted range voting.
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info