[EM] Resume: Proportional multi-winner ranked voting methods -

[Armando]

> El 2 jun 2017, a las 16:41, steve bosworth <stevebosworth at hotmail.com> escribió:
> 
> In response to your kind thanks below,  I would still like to point out that in contrast to  Associational Proportional Representation (APR), the "proportional multi-winner Condorcet [method] in very large magnitude constituencies" which you currently seem to prefer would still "waste" some citizen's votes both quantitatively and qualitatively.  

I’ve found your explication of APR
http://election-methods.electorama.narkive.com/61PGaAbe/em-no-wasted-votes <http://election-methods.electorama.narkive.com/61PGaAbe/em-no-wasted-votes>
Maybe I didn’t understand, however the main feature is that MPs’ votes have different weight. It implies a different view of assembly. In Italy you should change Constitution. 
Actually I prefer that all MPs have the same dignity, and would like to find a system where assemblies represent globally all electors.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20170604/5c78ec79/attachment.htm>