[EM] Resume: Proportional multi-winner ranked voting methods -

[Armando]

Online the aforementioned mathematicians society use Schulze-stv in real life. 
There is a website that let you manage and calculate the vote: https://modernballots.com <https://modernballots.com/>
Whit this site you can also produce a proportionally ordered list, if you need seats have different weight.

Other website using a proportionally Condorcet system is http://civs.cs.cornell.edu <http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/>

> El 4 jun 2017, a las 2:48, Juho Laatu <juho.laatu at gmail.com> escribió:
> 
>> On 04 Jun 2017, at 02:14, Mat Danaher <mat at organise.win> wrote:
> 
>> It is something I'm interested in and am think about making a case for using it for a grant awarding trust to decide projects to support...
> 
> If the granted awards can have different size, then we might consider also methods where the seats may have different weights. If the grants may be awarded to same applicants at different times (years?), then the method might cover also the history of awarded grants to this one applicant.
> 
> No need the make it this complex, I'm just thinking of different possible approaches to proportionality. Maybe, if you have a need to take this kind of considerations into account.
> 
> Juho
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20170604/9fd53c9e/attachment.htm>