[EM] Bucklin/IRV hybrid? Motivated by MSV strategy

[Jameson Quinn]

First: I'm curious what others think of MSDSV. It doesn't have unheard-of
properties, but it does seem to me that the combination of IRV and Bucklin
ideas is new; and that if others think about methods in this space there
might be something nice and easy to explain.

....


> We often hear it said that Approval has a large strategic burden, but, for
> most people, with our current candidate-lineup, there's nothing difficult
> about it: Approve (only) the progressive candidates. That's optimal for
> most people.
>

I'm sorry, but it seems to me that this is a particularly egregious example
of the typical mind fallacy. I believe the above is true for you, Mike, but
even though I think I share most of your terminal values I'm quite sure
it's not true for me, and I doubt it's true for most voters (in some cases,
because of different values; in other cases, because of different views of
what course of action will best pursue those values).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20161101/ca3902e0/attachment.htm>