[EM] Voting Benchmark
Kevin Venzke
stepjak at yahoo.fr
Tue Oct 6 06:58:50 PDT 2015
As you say, "once their preference is (partially) included their voting strength should lessen." Like (multi-seat) STV.
Kevin
De : Marijn Stollenga <m.stollenga at gmail.com>
À : Toby Pereira <tdp201b at yahoo.co.uk>; "election-methods at lists.electorama.com" <election-methods at lists.electorama.com>
Envoyé le : Mardi 6 octobre 2015 8h40
Objet : Re: [EM] Voting Benchmark
Hmm, how do you envision that? You start by selecting the strongest one and fill a list like that?
How would you prevent people from reusing their voting budget in that case?
Marijn
On 05/10/15 23:52, Toby Pereira wrote:
Couldn't you just use a proportional method that elects sequentially? That sounds like the sort of thing you're after.
From: Marijn Stollenga <m.stollenga at gmail.com>
To: election-methods at lists.electorama.com
Sent: Monday, 5 October 2015, 10:38
Subject: Re: [EM] Voting Benchmark
Thanks for all the suggestions. I'll briefly describe my method to make
my goal clear:
I want to avoid aggregating all votes in a tally, because I think that
loses information. Specifically, I would like a method that can find a
representative ranking. I.e. if I want the top 10 songs, it should
reflect the preferences of everyone, but not only contain electronic
music because a majority likes that.
When I you do the simple Schulze ranking (not STV) I find it
over-represents certain groups because they essentially can vote more
than once.
I think once their preference is (partially) included their voting
strength should lessen, but with a tally their vote can not be removed
(reduced) since it's all agglomerated.
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20151006/0018346f/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list