[EM] Voting Benchmark

[Marijn Stollenga]

Hmm, how do you envision that? You start by selecting the strongest one 
and fill a list like that?
How would you prevent people from reusing their voting budget in that case?

Marijn

On 05/10/15 23:52, Toby Pereira wrote:
> Couldn't you just use a proportional method that elects sequentially? 
> That sounds like the sort of thing you're after.
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Marijn Stollenga <m.stollenga at gmail.com>
>     *To:* election-methods at lists.electorama.com
>     *Sent:* Monday, 5 October 2015, 10:38
>     *Subject:* Re: [EM] Voting Benchmark
>
>     Thanks for all the suggestions. I'll briefly describe my method to
>     make
>     my goal clear:
>
>     I want to avoid aggregating all votes in a tally, because I think
>     that
>     loses information. Specifically, I would like a method that can
>     find a
>     representative ranking. I.e. if I want the top 10 songs, it should
>     reflect the preferences of everyone, but not only contain electronic
>     music because a majority likes that.
>     When I you do the simple Schulze ranking (not STV) I find it
>     over-represents certain groups because they essentially can vote more
>     than once.
>     I think once their preference is (partially) included their voting
>     strength should lessen, but with a tally their vote can not be
>     removed
>     (reduced) since it's all agglomerated.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20151006/3b1fe372/attachment.htm>