[EM] (2): UK 'post mortem', 2nd discussion between Steve and Fred Gohlke
Fred Gohlke
fredgohlke at verizon.net
Tue Jun 30 08:42:40 PDT 2015
Good Morning, Alexander Praetorius
re: Becoming "Self Employed" is as easy as it was NEVER BEFORE.
That's interesting. I've had four businesses during my lifetime. I
guess you could say starting them was not real difficult, but keeping
them going was a challenge. I lost that challenge the first two times I
tried. The third business was stable enough that I gave it to our
oldest daughter when the demands of the fourth started to require my
full attention. It's still functioning. I shut the fourth one down
when I was forced out by one of the executives in my only client (i.e.,
one of my bosses). Ah, well, by then it was time to retire, anyway
(although I didn't think so at the time).
These businesses allowed me to maintain my independence, and, with the
blessing of a wife who handled money much better than I - allowed me
(us, actually) to provide for and raise a large family. However, it
wasn't without its problems. I suppose I could list the difficulties,
but that would be boring.
re: While self-reliance is possible as an employee, it's
totally passive. You do as you have been told. You
execute goals set by employers.
When you have a business, you do what your customers tell you to do. In
my business, when a customer told me he wanted a truck to pick up this
afternoon and deliver Thursday, that's what I had to do, My goal was
execute my customer's goals. I doubt that a restaurant is much
different. If a customer wants bacon and eggs, he probably won't accept
pancakes.
re: You do not judge what you have been told to do, you
execute and use your skills and knowledge to do so to
the best of your ability and in return you get paid.
I think that's true - both of employees and small businesses. There are
differences between having a small business and working for someone.
The biggest is the amount of risk you have to accept. We should note
that the more people who depend on you for their existence, the more
difficult it is to put their welfare at risk.
re: With regard to your comments about the difference between
employees and self-employed people shaping reality:
"Employees do not participate in shaping the world around
them based on their values/morals/philosophies/worldview/...
and
"Self-Employed ... in the sense of being a small-scale
entrepreneur amongst many many other entrepreneurs have
to participate in shaping reality consciously.
These ideas are a bit expansive. To the extent that I understand them,
they do not square with my experience. It's true that I met with many
other people because of my business; my customers, their employees, my
competitors and their employees, and a multitude of others ranging from
waitresses to salesmen. Our discussions were dominated by the business
that brought us together. Philosophy and morality might occasionally
come up, but only as they affected some incident or aspect of our
business. The most common alternate topic was sports, There was no
discussion of democracy or politics.
The reason we didn't discuss democracy or politics is because we could
do nothing about them. We could not change anything. Our time was too
precious to waste discussing things we couldn't change.
While I don't think self-employed people are in any better position to
influence the development of democracy than anyone else, there is
extensive work being done, by scholars and others, in the use of
collaboration to achieve democratic results. Participedia
(http://participedia.net), for example, is dedicated to strengthening
democracy through shared knowledge and contains a multitude of examples
of work being done around the world, by all kinds of people.
If we are ever to achieve the kind of collaborative discourse you
envision, the very first and most important feature must be to provide a
way for the discussions to bear fruit, to change things. Absent that,
it will never be anything but talk.
Do you have some experience in making this kind of thing work? Can you
explain the specifics?
Fred Gohlke
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list