[EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal
pzbornik at gmail.com
Mon Sep 9 08:25:15 PDT 2013
and if I am correct, your proportional ranking method deals with Hylland
free riding optimally?
Could I send you the file we used in the election to see what result you
Could the file be on any format?
I am not a programmer, so it would help.
My objection to Condorcet methods is so far, that it promots burial and
thus elects "nobodies".
2013/9/9 Markus Schulze <Markus.Schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de>
> Dear Peter,
> I guess that you are talking about "Hylland free riding",
> rather than about "favourite betrayal".
> See section 7 of my paper:
> "In this context, Hylland free riding means that a voter
> votes preferably for those of his favorite candidates who
> are lower in the expected party list. (...) With this
> strategy the stronger candidates get lower places than
> they would have got otherwise, while the weaker candidates
> get better places than they would have got otherwise;
> therefore, the aim of this strategy is that the stronger
> candidates get places that are still good enough and that
> the weaker candidates get places that are just good enough
> to get elected."
> Markus Schulze
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Election-Methods