[EM] Survey of Multiwinner Methods

[Abd ul-Rahman Lomax]

At 04:04 PM 1/7/2013, Greg Nisbet wrote:
>Hey, I'd like to get a sense of what sorts of multiwinner methods 
>are currently known that are reasonably good and don't require 
>districts, parties, or candidates that are capable of making 
>decisions (I'm looking at you, asset voting).

Right. We only want to elect candidates not capable of communicating 
and negotating on behalf of the public.