[EM] Comments on MJ discussion

[Andy Jennings]

> IIAC merely says that removal of a losing candidate shouldn't change
> the result.
>
> IIAC says nothing about whether there should be another election if a
> losing candidate calls for one without hir in it..
>
> IIAC is merely about consistent count-mechanics, given an unchanging
> set of ballots.
>

Well, you're arguing for a definition of IIAC that even plurality passes.

I find it lacking, and do not accept it for my definition of "independence
of irrelevant alternatives".

~ Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20130107/16c13db2/attachment-0004.htm>