[EM] Symmetrical ICT can work as intended, and meet Later-No-Help.

[Jameson Quinn]

2012/10/12 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>

> It's easily fixed.
>
> To the definition, after the line
>
> X beats Y iff (X>Y) + (X=Y)B > (Y>X) + (X=Y)T...
>
> insert:
>
> ...except that two candidates can't beat eachother. If the above line
> would have two candidates beat eachother, then one of them beats the
> other. The one that beats the other is the one who is ranked over the
> other on more ballots than vice-versa.
>
>
So the only way this is different from Condorcet is if two candidates don't
beat each other in either direction?

Seeing if I understand,
Jameson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20121012/6ad6ab17/attachment-0003.htm>