[EM] unsubscribe

[Kelvin T. Leung]

On Feb 17, 2012, at 12:01 PM, election-methods-request at lists.electorama.com wrote:

> Send Election-Methods mailing list submissions to
> 	election-methods at lists.electorama.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.electorama.com/listinfo.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	election-methods-request at lists.electorama.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	election-methods-owner at lists.electorama.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Election-Methods digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: SODA arguments (Jameson Quinn)
>   2. Re: Question about Schulze beatpath method
>      (robert bristow-johnson)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:37:26 -0600
> From: Jameson Quinn <jameson.quinn at gmail.com>
> To: EM <election-methods at lists.electorama.com>,
> 	electionsciencefoundation <electionscience at googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [EM] SODA arguments
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAO82iZwVDmu6W3t2juN1tcTRwu53a4961q5GOcSiNdiTaL15sA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
>> 
>> 
>> For those who feel that strategic resistance is the most important, SODA
>> is unmatched. It ... has no burial incentive (ie, meets later-no-help),
>> 
> 
> Oops. I got carried away. "No burial incentive" is arguably true, but it
> doesn't universally meet later-no-help, only up to 4 candidates.
> 
> Jameson
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20120217/6a6fb880/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:56:24 -0500
> From: robert bristow-johnson <rbj at audioimagination.com>
> To: election-methods at lists.electorama.com
> Subject: Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method
> Message-ID: <4F3EA2D8.6080209 at audioimagination.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> On 2/17/12 1:27 PM, Markus Schulze wrote:
>> it can happen that the weakest link in the strongest path
>> from candidate A to candidate B and the weakest link in the
>> strongest path from candidate B to candidate A is the same link,
>> say CD.
> 
> how can that be?  since a path is a *defeat* path.  you only traverse a 
> beatpath from a candidate who beats the next candidate in the path.
> 
> is it that candidates C and D are exactly tied?  other than that, i 
> cannot understand how the weakest link from A to B can be the same as 
> *any* link from B to A.
> 
> -- 
> 
> r b-j                  rbj at audioimagination.com
> 
> "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Election-Methods mailing list
> Election-Methods at lists.electorama.com
> http://lists.electorama.com/listinfo.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com
> 
> 
> End of Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 76
> ************************************************