[EM] Mike O.

[Jameson Quinn]

2012/1/24 David L Wetzell <wetzelld at gmail.com>

>
>> dlw: I agree with JQ's approach of realism that presumes that LNH or the
>>
>>
>>
>> Weak Cournot Winner problem matters because it is important to take into
>> account the fears of incumbents when pushing electoral reform.
>>
>> [endquote]
>>
>> ...so Dave is pushing for something that current incumbants will like because it
>>
>>
>>
>> will keep on electing the same two odious parties, as lesser-evils, at Myerson-Weber equilibrium.
>>
>>
> dlw: nope, I'm pushing for a package that'll result
>

You mean, "that'll probably/arguably/usually result", which is not the same
thing at all.


> in there tending to be two rather different major parties held accountable
> by an indefinite no. of minor parties and a lot of LTPs.  I believe that
> the  problem isn't the tendency for there to be 2 major parties, but rather
> the tendency for there to be only one major party and a stagnant center.
>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20120124/4698a197/attachment-0002.htm>