[EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

On 02/10/2012 11:02 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
> We can add a candidate C_k to PC if there exists a subset (coalition)
> that supports at least k+1 candidates, where k is the cardinality of the
> intersection of PC and that coalition, and that coalition also contains
> C_k.

Oops, seems I reused a letter there. This should be:

"We can add a candidate C_i to PC if there exists a subset (coalition) 
that supports at least k+1 candidates, where k is the cardinality of the 
  intersection of PC and that coalition, and that coalition also 
contains C_i."

I.e. the k in C_k had nothing to do with the cardinality of the 
intersection.