[EM] Voting reform statement; a clearer and more inspiring, version

[Richard Fobes]

On 8/24/2011 2:15 PM, Markus Schulze wrote:
> ...
> Well, one of the most frequently used arguments
> against Condorcet methods is that there are too
> many Condorcet methods and that there is no
> agreement on the best one.
>
> Markus Schulze

Perhaps we can add a statement that says something like:

"In most cases the different Condorcet methods identify the same winner. 
  Occasionally they identify different winners, but those situations 
involve complications that make it difficult to objectively determine 
which candidate is really the most popular. Each of these Condorcet 
methods has slight advantages and disadvantages compared to one another, 
and some are easier to explain than others. Yet in all cases they 
provide dramatically fairer results compared to plurality voting, and 
significantly fairer results compared to instant-runoff voting, so any 
of them is suitable for use in governmental elections."

Richard Fobes