[EM] Record activity on the EM list?

[Juho Laatu]

I noticed that there was a lot of activity on the multi-winner side. Earlier I have even complained about the lack of interest in multi-winner methods. Now there are still some interesting but unread mails in my inbox.

Multi-winner methods are, if possible, even more complicated than single-winner methods. Maybe one reason behind the record is that there are still so many uncovered (in this word's regular non-EM English meaning) candidates to cover.

Juho


On 3.8.2011, at 3.48, fsimmons at pcc.edu wrote:

> Towards the end of July, I noticed that I had to scroll down a long ways in the archive to get to the most 
> recent messages. 
> 
> I wonder if we set some kind of record. 
> 
> If we were approaching or receding from a major election, it would be more understandable.  
> 
> Maybe all of the feisty guys are getting too tame, so nothing gets censored.
> 
> Maybe Rob is getting lax on filtering out the stuff that doesn't have Nobel prize potential :)
> 
> 
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info