[EM] legislature size
Michael Allan
mike at zelea.com
Tue Apr 26 09:42:47 PDT 2011
If you allow for proxy voting, then you might also allow for the
possibility of the electors participating directly in the legislative
process. They might use a system of proxy voting to initiate, draft
and vote up their own bills.* For those bills, the ideal size of the
-actual- legislature would probably be the size of the electorate (the
max size), while that of the formal legislature could be reduced to
one. A single elected executive could efficiently oversee the
judicial review and promulgation of all elector-initiated bills.
In practice, most existing consitutional assemblies are probably
competent to take on both roles - official and elector-initiated
legislation - simultaneously.
* A possible method is outlined here:
http://zelea.com/project/votorola/d/theory.xht#action-norm
--
Michael Allan
Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
http://zelea.com/
Michael Rouse wrote:
> If you were going to use a proxy-type voting system, you could make the
> following rules:
>
> 1. A successful candidate must have votes greater than or equal to the
> square root of the total number of ballots cast.
> 2. The total number of successful candidate cannot be greater than the
> fourth root of the total number of ballots cast (the square root of the
> square root).
>
> In the 2008 election, 122,394,724 people voted for President. The first
> rule would mean that to be seated in the legislature, a candidate would
> need at least 11,064 votes, and the maximum number of legislators would
> be 105.
>
> Of course, if you wanted to be closer to Warren's 250 limit, you could
> take twice the fourth root (~210) or half of the cube root (~248). If
> you were going to go the proxy (asset) route, there probably should be
> some simple relation between the total votes cast, the minimum votes
> needed to be elected, and the total number of legislators, without
> fixing any single number in stone.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list