[EM] legislature size
Michael Rouse
mrouse1 at mrouse.com
Mon Apr 25 17:17:44 PDT 2011
If you were going to use a proxy-type voting system, you could make the
following rules:
1. A successful candidate must have votes greater than or equal to the
square root of the total number of ballots cast.
2. The total number of successful candidate cannot be greater than the
fourth root of the total number of ballots cast (the square root of the
square root).
In the 2008 election, 122,394,724 people voted for President. The first
rule would mean that to be seated in the legislature, a candidate would
need at least 11,064 votes, and the maximum number of legislators would
be 105.
Of course, if you wanted to be closer to Warren's 250 limit, you could
take twice the fourth root (~210) or half of the cube root (~248). If
you were going to go the proxy (asset) route, there probably should be
some simple relation between the total votes cast, the minimum votes
needed to be elected, and the total number of legislators, without
fixing any single number in stone.
On 4/25/2011 2:56 PM, Warren Smith wrote:
> here's an idea. Find out how many bills a typical legislator writes
> that make it to a floor vote. If this number if below 1, then the
> legislature is too large. (Course, there are bullshit do-nothing
> bills galore. Some way need to be found to exclude them.)
>
> If a legislature is to debate each substantive bill for 1 day, that means
> there can be at most 365 substantive bills per year. Actually thanks
> to weekends, vacations, etc, more like 250. That means, if there are
> any more than 250 congressmen, then at least one of them will be
> unable to write a substantive bill each year.
>
> So I conclude legislature size ought to be capped at 250 or less.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20110425/4caf7c8b/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list