[EM] Explaining PR-STV

Raph Frank raphfrk at gmail.com
Fri Aug 28 06:08:28 PDT 2009


One of the hardest parts about PR-STV is actually explaining it.

Anyway, this was an approach I was thinking of.

I think it hits the main points by covering the reasons rather than
the detailed maths.  Most people in PR-STV countries understand the
method, as they experience it from a voter's perspective, rather than
a counter's perspective.


PR-STV is based on 4 main principles

1) Each voter gets 1 vote and they can vote for any candidate they want.

** All votes are equal. **

2) The 5 candidates who get the most votes get a seat.

I am assuming 5 seats are to be filled, but the system works for any number.

3) If you vote for a losing candidate, your vote is transferred to
your next choice

This reason for this rule is is so that you can safely give your first
choice to your favourite even if he is a weak candidate.

If he doesn't win, your vote will be transferred to your next highest
choice, until it gets to a candidate who can win a seat.

** Voting for a weak candidate doesn't mean you are "throwing your
vote away". **

4) If you vote for a candidate who gets more votes than he needs, the
surplus is transferred to your next choice.

The Quota is simply the minimum number of votes a candidate needs in
order to be guaranteed to be one of the top 5.

If 5 candidates had a quota of votes, then even if all the rest of the
votes go to one of the other candidate, he would have less than the
quota.

If you vote for a candidate and he gets twice the Quota, then he only
needs half of your vote to get elected.

He keeps half of your vote and the rest of your vote would go to your
next choice.

** Voting for a strong candidate also doesn't mean you are "throwing
your vote away". **

The Ballot

The ballot allows the voter the rank the candidates (who is your
favourite candidate, who is your next favourite and so on).

** This gives the voter full control over how their vote is transferred. **

The Count

In the first round, all the first choices are counted.

If no candidate is greater than the quota, then the weakest candidate
is eliminated and his votes are transferred.

Otherwise, the candidate with more than the quota is declared elected
and his surplus votes are transferred.

This is repeated round by round until all 5 seats are filled.

--

There would need to be a discussion on the loss (or lack thereof) of
the "local-link" due to the larger constituencies and unstable
governments.  Also, there would need to be a discussion of
proportionality.  For example, show some first past the post results
and some PR-STV country results.

Also, there could be a discussion of the effective threshold due to a
small number of seats.

If there was an example of the count, it might also be worth giving
the viewer an example ballot that is his ballot.  You could then say
stuff like "unfortunately, your first choice (A) didn't get elected,
so your vote goes to your next choice (B)".



More information about the Election-Methods mailing list