[EM] No geographical districts

[Jonathan Lundell]

On Sep 3, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Allen Smith wrote:

> In message <BAY104-F37EB23BC91C64156A090F68F5E0 at phx.gbl> (on 3  
> September
> 2008 22:01:24 +0000), stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
> (=?iso-8859-1?B?U3TpcGhhbmUgUm91aWxsb24=?=) wrote:
>> Hello electorama fans,
>>
>> regarding that last comment, I invite those interested in non- 
>> geographical
>> district to consider astrological district.
>
> How about self-chosen districts? One element of current geographical
> districts is that people at least theoretically (and in some actual  
> cases -
> see Libertarians moving to New Hampshire, Alaska, etc for instance)  
> can
> choose to move to be more around people they agree more with; that  
> even this
> (frequently impractical) method would be impossible with such a  
> system would
> be one objection to it.

STV-PR, baby.