[Election-Methods] PR favoring racial minorities (Gilmour/Dopp?)
Juho
juho4880 at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jul 31 09:39:33 PDT 2008
On Jul 31, 2008, at 0:50 , Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
> In any case, the left-right problem would still be a limitation to
> RRV, where ballots are set so that RV (and any sensible method)
> would elect Center first, but where electing an assembly of two
> should elect Left and Right. For some reason, that problem doesn't
> appear in party list, but I don't know why.
I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but isn't that the same
difference as between highest average based methods (http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highest_averages_method) and largest reminder
based methods (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_remainder_method)
that both can be used with party lists?
I guess any method that picks the winners one by one until sufficient
number of representatives has been elected fails to elect both the
centrist (1 representative) and left+right (2 representatives) in the
example above. On the other hand if we follow the example that means
that Alabama paradox is what we want.
Juho
___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list