[EM] [Election-Methods] [english 94%] PR favoring racialminorities
Jonathan Lundell
jlundell at pobox.com
Fri Aug 15 15:16:25 PDT 2008
On Aug 15, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
>>> Also, such a scheme would be, I think, highly susceptible to
>>> agenda manipulation: who decides which issue is to be effectively
>>> on the ballot, and who decides that the candidates associated with
>>> X and not-X are sincere?
>> Citizens are free to form such lists. Each list may support and
>> oppose any topics, and the lists are supposed to collect similar
>> minded candidates together. Ballots may be just votes for
>> individual candidates (not for issues). I don't see any specific
>> problems in this case.
>
> Does that mean that a single candidate can be a member of more than
> one list? If so, how are ties handled? Depending on how that's done,
> it could cause complex interactions depending on which party a voter
> decides to support.
>
> If a single candidate can't be on more than one list, then agenda
> manipulation still has some power. If a candidate has to commit to a
> list that is based primarily on issue X, but where he also supports
> Y, he has to make a choice (distinct from the choices voters make)
> of X over Y. That could be technically solved by making 2^n "lists"
> for n issues, but then you'd have to let candidates be on multiple
> lists, and pure "party-neutral" PR becomes much simpler.
>
> Tree lists would help, but say that a voter likes Y, but not X any
> more than the candidate in question does. Then he wouldn't want to
> have his vote contribute to any of the other X-favoring candidates.
I could see a kind of proxy front end to STV elections. I'm not sure
I'm convinced it would be a good idea, or even practical to implement,
but suppose that any person or group (including parties) could
register an STV ranking, and a voter could select that ranking instead
of ranking individual candidates. The logistical difficulty would be
in determining how a voter specified their proxy, along with the
possibility of ambiguity deliberate or accidental ("Siera Club", "John
Smith").
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list