[EM] Ka-Ping Yee's voting behavior pictures

[Juho]

I touched this topic briefly in last December.
http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/ 
2006-December/019072.html
I haven't heard anyone picking up the idea and doing such  
simulations, including myself :-). However I still think that it  
would be a god idea to study also the completion methods using some  
slightly different simulation set-up that would reveal the differences.

See also:
http://bolson.org/voting/sim_one_seat/www/spacegraph.html
http://bolson.org/voting/sim_one_seat/zoomout/
http://bolson.org/voting/sim_one_seat/dist/
http://www.geocities.com/stepjak/index.htm

Juho




On Jun 28, 2007, at 2:28 , <mrouse1 at mrouse.com> <mrouse1 at mrouse.com>  
wrote:

> I looked on the original images with extreme interest, as well as the
> images that Warren produced, and I was just wondering if anyone had
> produced images showing any differences in Condorcet completion  
> methods.
> (At least, I *think* there should be some difference, though I know  
> Warren
> Smith mentioned Condorcet images appeared clone-immune in 2-d  
> scenarios).
> Of course, none of the methods would be as wacky ask IRV, but there  
> might
> be interesting behavior on the borders between candidates.
>
> Anyway, if someone had a bunch of beautiful new images to show (even
> non-Condorcet methods), I'd be interested in seeing them.
>
> Thanks!
> Michael Rouse
>
>
>
> ----
> election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for  
> list info


		
___________________________________________________________ 
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html