[Election-Methods] RE : Re: Is this Condorcet method reasonable?

Dave Ketchum davek at clarityconnect.com
Sun Dec 2 17:51:39 PST 2007

Apologies!  I picked what looked good to me as a winner, and then assumed 
I understood compatible rules.

Since I had the rules wrong, please forget what I said based on them.


On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:33:55 +0100 (CET) Kevin Venzke wrote:
> Dave,
> --- Dave Ketchum <davek at clarityconnect.com> a écrit :
>>>Offensive strategy by A voters:
>>>46: A > C > B
>>>44: C > B > A
>>>10: B > A > C
>>>A wins under RP(wv) or margins.
>>??? A voters say they like C better than B - suspicious for, to me, this 
>>makes a cycle with C winning (90>10 voters prefer C>B; 56>44 A>C; 54>46
> A wins the cycle because A's loss to B is the weakest loss.
> Kevin Venzke
  davek at clarityconnect.com    people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
  Dave Ketchum   108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY  13827-1708   607-687-5026
            Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
                  If you want peace, work for justice.

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list