[EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits

[Kevin Venzke]

Hi,

--- mrouse1 at mrouse.com a écrit :
> Juho wrote:
> > My usual example is this:
> > 25:A>B>D>C
> > 25:B>C>D>A
> > 25:C>A>D>B
> > 24:D
> >
> I ran the example through the Rob LeGrand's election calculator at
> http://cec.wustl.edu/~rhl1/rbvote/calc.html and got the following:
> 
> Winner: D
> Dodgson
> Simpson
> 
> Which seemed like an odd result to me. Any idea why Dodgson and Simpson
> gave the Condorcet loser?

Both of those methods (as defined on that site) like D because he has
many votes in all of his contests, even though he doesn't win any of
them.

Simpson does not care about pairwise wins vs. losses. Dodgson does to
some extent, but not enough to keep D from winning. It considers D's
three losses combined to be much more forgivable than any of ABC's
single losses.

Kevin Venzke


	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! 
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com