[EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result
Brian Olson
bql at bolson.org
Tue Mar 14 01:06:02 PST 2006
Oops!
And a good thing for double checks!
The good thing about having implemented all these things 4-5 times is
that I had another set of code to check myself against, and that
agreed with Mr. LeGrand's calculations. I found the bug in my new
code which erroneously reported that IRV and VRR disagreed on this one.
Now all is agreement, so we must even be counting tie-rank-votes the
same.
Fixed results of a bunch of systems at these spots:
http://two.bolson.org/a.html
http://two.bolson.org/2b.html
On Mar 10, 2006, at 11:25 PM, Rob LeGrand wrote:
> I took the raw data from the site Brian Olson posted and ended up
> with a
> slightly different pairwise table:
>
> (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
> (0) - 5545 6747 3991 6790 7336
> (1) 3556 - 5165 3397 5136 5875
> (2) 1161 1289 - 804 2028 3290
> (3) 4763 5730 6961 - 7027 7351
> (4) 987 1318 1869 603 - 3094
> (5) 323 311 431 194 510 -
>
> (0) Hinda Miller
> (1) Kevin J. Curley
> (2) Louie The Cowman Beaudin
> (3) Bob Kiss
> (4) Loyal Ploof
> (5) Write-ins
>
> It's identical to the one at http://two.bolson.org/a.html except
> for the
> first column: I have Hinda Miller with many more votes against
> her. I've
> looked for errors in my results but haven't found the problem. If I'm
> right, the Condorcet winner changes from Miller to Bob Kiss, the IRV
> winner. I think finding a real-world election in which IRV failed to
> elect the voted Condorcet candidate would be quite significant, so I'm
> hoping my results are wrong, but they do seem more consistent with the
> final round of the real IRV election (although they're still off by a
> handful of ballots). It'd be great if someone else could take the raw
> data from the election page and triple-check the results
> independently.
> Regardless of the result, thanks to Brian for pointing this out.
>
> --
> Rob LeGrand, psephologist
> rob at approvalvoting.org
> Citizens for Approval Voting
> http://www.approvalvoting.org/
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list