[EM] Question about a criterion for ballot counting

Alex Small alex_small2002 at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 6 14:33:46 PDT 2006

  I have looked at one or two of Woodall's papers.  Do you have a reference for that "continuous" criterion?  It's not quite what I'm looking for, but it's close.

Kevin Venzke wrote:
    Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:23:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kevin Venzke 
Subject: Re: [EM] Question about a criterion for ballot counting
To: election-methods at electorama.com
Message-ID: <20060606162317.36120.qmail at web26803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1


The only thing similar that occurs to me is some features Woodall has used.
For instance:

  Continuous - if the result isn't a tie, then there's some value greater than zero by which every ballot type proportion can be adjusted which will still result in the same winner


Kevin Venzke

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20060606/04e99a6d/attachment-0003.htm>

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list