[EM] Scott Ritchie's FAVS criterion - uniquely favors range voting

[Chris Benham]

Warren Smith wrote:

>Yes to Chris Benham; I independently came up with a very similar IRV FAVS-violation example
>and posted it on 
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RangeVoting/message/2716
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RangeVoting/message/2708
>
>To Scott Ritchie, yes, I just invented the name FAVS and IFAVS (incomplete info version).
>
>Perhaps FAVA is better name than FAVS.
>
>N.Tideman told me, however, that he does not consider FAVS-satisfaction necessarily to
>be a good thing.  In fact, he thinks it is probably a bad thing.
>
So what is that is supposed to be good about satisfying  FAVS ?


Chris Benham