[EM] Thanks for postsing the 1790 results

[MIKE OSSIPOFF]

The 1790 apportionment results, and their bias test, demonstrate what I've 
been saying: Hill signifiantly favors smaller states over larger ones, with 
much more bias than Hamilton or Webster.

The greatest ratio by which s/q varies is minimized by Hill, of course.  The 
_differences_ in s/q are minimized by Webster. But I claim that what really 
matters is Hill's systematic giving of more s/q to smaller states. 
Systematically favoring large or small states is inexcusable for an 
apportionment method.

Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Find sales, coupons, and free shipping, all in one place!  MSN Shopping 
Sales & Deals 
http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctid=198,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200639